Dan każ li jista’ joħloq
preċedenti serji. Infatti kont qed
niddiskuti dis-sentenza ma’ esperta lokali fis-sesmoloġija u hi qaltli kif dan
kien każ sfortunat u li faċli li wieħed jiġġudika wara li seħħ l-inċident u
mhux qabel. Hi qaltli li sesmologu jrid
joqgħod attent ħafna li ma joħroġx twissijiet għal kull attivita’ sesmologa li
sseħħ għax kieku tant joħorġu twissijiet li ħadd ma jibqa’ jeħodhom
bis-serjeta’. Fl-istess waqt pero,
sesmologu jrid joqgħod attent ħafna fuq kemm jiżgura lin-nies li ma hemmx
periklu għax kif ġara f’dan il-każ, għax fl-aħħarnett dawn huma atti tan-natura
li l-ebda xjenza perfetta mhi qatt se tasal biex tipprevedihom.
Dan każ li kif għidt jista’
joħnoq ix-xogħol utli tan-nies tax-xjenza u kif dawn jikkomunikaw is-sejbiet
tagħhom. Importanti li kulħadd jifhem li
fl-aħħarnett il-bniedem jista’ jersaq qrib li jifhem in-natura pero ħadd ma
jista jkun jaf b’ċertezza dak li se jseħħ.
Dan il-ħsieb ġie espress ukoll mill- IASPEI (The
International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth Interior) meta
qalet fi stqarrija: When serving on high-level advisory panels for governments and
authorities, scientists have the duty to provide the state of knowledge in a
comprehensive and unbiased fashion, to enable authorities to take the required
mitigation actions. This cannot be achieved under the threat of public
prosecution. A negative impact of this trial and sentence will be to make
scientists reluctant to serve on risk advisory commissions or express expert
opinions.
No comments:
Post a Comment